Why Kubernetes Observability Is Essential for Your Organization

Why do you need Kubernetes observability? Let's understand the three pillars of observability and dive into some challenges in implementing observability.

The Kubernetes service simplifies load balancing and container management of containerized applications. Simply put, it makes it easier for enterprise applications to have greater scalability, flexibility, and portability. After Linux, Kubernetes is one of the fastest-growing projects in the history of open-source software. According to a study by CNFC, the number of Kubernetes engineers grew by 67% to 3.9 million. 

It is a go-to solution for cloud orchestration in distributed environments. But, cloud architecture has become complicated, and organizations find it challenging to fix the bugs. When developers need to address the root cause, they encounter a lack of observability due to non-tracking of the state of Kubernetes, serverless functions, and other aspects of cloud architecture. This lack of visibility into what’s going on led to the need for Kubernetes Observability.

What’s Kubernetes Observability?

Observability is the potential to measure the current state of a system based on logs, metrics, and traces. 

In the modern environment, the cloud infrastructure, container, and microservices, etc. are all potential data sources generating loads of data every day. The main objective of observability is to facilitate a holistic assessment of all this data coming from disparate systems.

Kubernetes observability helps address issues by bringing everything into context and takes you to the root of the issue. This leads to a shorter time for resolution, prevention of issues blowing up, and huge cost savings in the form of averted crisis.

Three Pillars of Observability

The term observability is best described as the ability to observe systems via different external outputs in order to detect any irregularities and fix them. 

Talking about the external outputs, these are generated by systems. They fall under three main pillars: 

#1. Logs:  They are files that store events, warnings, and errors, which generally occur in the software environment. Logs contain contextual information. For example, the particular time of an event. The log messages represent data in three forms i.e., plain text, structured, and binary format. However, log messages require ample storage space. Therefore, make sure you have enough storage space before generating them. 

#2. Metrics: They are a numerical representation of data. It can be used to determine the service or component behavior over a specific period of time. This pillar embraces a set of attributes, such as name, value, and timestamp, which transfer information about SLAs, SLOs, and SLIs.

Metrics are real-time savers. This is because one can easily correlate them across infrastructure components in order to get a holistic view of system health and performance. It also enables longer data retention. 

If you want to know about what is happening in your system and notice a sudden spike in traffic, then metrics provide deeper insights and visibility. It helps you understand the reason for the spike, such as malicious behavior or incorrect service configuration. 

#3. Tracing: A trace represents a series of causally related distributed events, which encode end-to-end request flow via a distributed system. In actuality, traces are a representation of logs, and a single trace looks like an event log. 

Challenges in Implementing Observability for Kubernetes

Dealing With Data Silos

Conventional monitoring tools are built to collect metrics at the application and infrastructure levels. Kubernetes is dynamic, ephemeral, and distributed in nature. The collection style of these tools creates data silos. When DevOps include more metrics for observation, data silos can lead to uneven cross-references and data misinterpretation, leading to slower communication and error-prone analysis.

Managing Large Volumes of Data

Deployments in Kubernetes depend on different components like pods, containers, and microservices. Such are a part of the ephemeral and distributed infrastructure. And it results in the entire system generating a great volume of data at each layer. It also keeps increasing with the multiplying scale of services. It becomes hard to track patterns and follows debugging, making observability and troubleshooting all the more complex.

Waiting Time Troubleshooting

Several teams (application, infrastructure, and digital experience) try to identify the root cause of problems and waste valuable time. Also, they try to make sense of telemetry and come up with solutions. 

Keeping Up With the Dynamic Nature of Kubernetes

Undeniably, Kubernetes clusters are complicated. Due to its continuous evolution, the container instances will increase and decrease when the demand fluctuates. Thus, the logs, traces, and metrics accumulated at one time may not resemble the same ones. In the same way, the configuration for the log and metric stream will change periodically.

One of the best practices to maintain observability in real-time is letting your teams get insights into the system even though the existing state of clusters is different. 

Why Is Kubernetes Observability Essential for Your Business?

In an organization, when the team of developers struggles to track the state of Kubernetes and serverless functions, they address the root cause of their problems, i.e., lack of observability. 

When it comes to an understanding the idea behind the term “observability,” then it is not a synonym of “logging” or “metrics” or not just a feature. However, it is the idea of how long the team of developers in an organization takes time to understand the problem. Plus, how long does it take to recognize the issue, identify the root cause, and come up with a solution? 

An excellent observability strategy can be best described when developers look at the dashboard and immediately understand the cause of the problem. On the contrary, if your team of developers needs to understand the issue for long hours and check manually in order to fix the problem, the “lack of observability” is what your organization needs to take action immediately. 

Below are four standards that indicate that your business is using observability in the right manner to track, visualize, and troubleshoot the entire Kubernetes environment:

#1. Understand In-Cluster Communication

The most common challenge is understanding communication between the nodes and pods within a cluster. It can be achieved using standards such as OpenTelemetry and open-source tools (Prometheus, StatsD, or Zipkin). Apart from these tools, tracking in-cluster communication gives insight into metrics: error rates, transaction times, and throughput. 

#2. Tracing Requests Around the Tech Stack

Distributed tracing is a method of tracking and observing requests as they propagate through distributed cloud environments. But, even though the best system could not cover every step of a request’s path. The distributed tracing calculates timing information from every part of a tech stack. It provides an excellent tool while overcoming these monitoring gaps and chasing intermittent bugs throughout the system. 

#3. Tracking Overall Health & Dynamic Behavior

Never underestimate the power of infrastructure monitoring. Whenever unexpected behaviors and performance issues arise, the first step needed is to evaluate a cluster's overall health. A business with good Kubernetes observability practices will be able to track API server stat and scheduler and understand what's happening at any given moment.

#4. Correlating Log Data & Performance Evaluation

Speed is everything regarding observability, in addition to how long one takes to solve a problem. To overcome such challenges as delaying data correlation, it’s recommended to use open-source observability tools like OpenTelemetry. This tool works well to address this problem by connecting logging data to other monitoring tools. This way, it makes it easier for developers to correlate the main causes and check what triggers a particular issue. 

On the other hand, the other aspect is correlating performance evaluation. It includes parent organization or user geography. It lets developers think outside the box and try new solutions to problems. 

Wrapping Up

In this article, you’ve gone through some aspects of Kubernetes observability, which can help organizations in many ways, such as minimizing disruptions, maintaining velocity, and enhancing business performance. 

The ultimate goal is to elevate your business’ performance. But, it is not all easy without consulting a team of experts who have expertise in enterprise observability. So, while choosing an expert for your business, do the necessary due diligence. 

You can comment below if you want to share your thoughts on Kubernetes observability. 

 

We Provide consulting, implementation, and management services on DevOps, DevSecOps, Cloud, Automated Ops, Microservices, Infrastructure, and Security

Services offered by us: https://www.zippyops.com/services

Our Products: https://www.zippyops.com/products

Our Solutions: https://www.zippyops.com/solutions

For Demo, videos check out YouTube Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FYvPooN_Tg&list=PLCJ3JpanNyCfXlHahZhYgJH9-rV6ouPro

If this seems interesting, please email us at [email protected] for a call.

Relevant Blogs:

Securing Your Cloud with Zero Trust and Least Privilege 

A Comprehensive Guide to Cloud Application Security Audits 

How to Build Security for Your SaaS User Communications 

17 DevOps Metrics You Should Be Tracking